Posted by Lisa Laree to Beer Lahai Roi
Y'all, I have a pile of stuff to do but I've let this ride too long; I miss it when I can't get to it. Down to TWO Saturdays between Now and Thanksgiving and I feel like I haven't made a lot of progress on the Things That Must Be Done.
So...a bit of a break to let the drier run and my back rest, lol. A cup of fruity herbal tea and... here we go at our look at 'heart/ hearts' in the NIV8...and, at this point, I'm just going to say that ALL references to heart/ hearts are Strong's G2588, Kardia - the heart, unless otherwise noted. As that's been the case in about 98% of what we have looked at so far, I'm just going to state that and avoid the repeated interruption to the discussion, lol.
We are up to Luke 5 today...the paralytic lowered through the roof, which we have already looked at in Matthew and in Mark.... the roof is torn open...which was likely a matter of breaking through some mud and leaf thatching...the guy is lowered down, and Jesus rather unexpectedly pronounces the guy as forgiven...based on the faith of he and his friends (Lk. 5:20)
The Pharisees and the Teachers of the Law who were hanging about were immediately offended, thinking to themselves, "Who is this fellow who speaks blasphemy? Who can forgive sins but God alone?" (Lk 5:21b)
Jesus knew what they were thinking and asked, "Why are you thinking these things in your hearts? Which is easier: to say, 'Your sins are forgiven' or to say, 'Get up and walk'? But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins...." He said to the paralyzed man, "I tell you, get up, take your mat, and go home." Lk 5:22-24.
And the guy immediately stood up, picked up his mat and went home praising God (Lk 5:25). Different things have struck me about this little scene in all three versions...and this time what hit was Luke's logical argument that Jesus had the authority to heal, therefore he had the authority to forgive sin, which, by the Pharisees and Teacher's own declaration, showed himself to be God.
The Jewish leaders were always blundering into that error...declaring that 'only God' could do a thing, and then, when Jesus did it, they ignored their own statement and tried to cobble together other explanations. It is still a problem with religious leaders today...none of us should forget that the enemy will NOT do anything that results in people praising God as they go home. Praising a person or an organization, sure, but praising God...nope, that would be like one enemy handing another enemy ammunition to fire at him.
Luke then rather summarizes some of the teachings from the Sermon on the Mount, and the next verse that references Heart/ hearts is towards the end of chapter 6:
"The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks." -- Lk 6:45
For grins, I looked up 'good' - Strong's G 18,Agathos (guessing the origin of the name 'Agatha') and 'evil' - Strong's G 4190, Poneros and found something very interesting.
'Good' was kind of what I expected -- 'of good constitution or nature, useful, salutary, good, pleasant, agreeable, joyful, happy, excellent, distinguished, upright, honourable'
All very Philippians 4:8ish words.
But 'evil'...that surprised me. Of course, part of the rendering is 'bad, of a bad nature or condition...in a physical sense: diseased or blind, in an ethical sense: evil, wicked, bad' ...pretty much what I expected, but that was only half of it. The rest, and the bit listed first, is 'Full of labours, annoyances, hardships; pressed and harassed by labours; bringing toils, annoyances, perils, of a time full of peril to Christian faith and steadfastness, causing pain and trouble.'
So the person with all those positive things in his/ her heart will say/ do accordingly...but the evil person is not necessarily a Snidely Whiplash sort...looking for dastardly deeds to commit just for the jollification of causing pain.....it could just be someone who is worn down and worried and is not having success in something that matters. And what that person says/ does will reflect doom and gloom and disappointment. Cynicism, maybe. Discouragement.
What is in the heart is what comes out.
Moving on; the next little story is something that only Luke records. Jesus and his disciples...and a bunch of other folks with them...were heading into the town of Nain, and they met a funeral procession; we don't know the age of the deceased, but he is reported to be the only son of his widowed mother. Her situation would have been very similar to Naomi and Ruth...with no husband/son to provide, things would be very, very bleak for her.
When the LORD saw her, his heart went out to her and he said, "Don't cry." -- Lk. 7: 13. This is one of the variances; the NIV used this phrase instead of 'he had compassion on her', which is in the King James, and the Greek word there is G4697 - splagchnizomai. (verb) - to be moved as to one's bowels, hence, to be moved with compassion, have compassion (for the bowels were thought to be the seat of love and pity).
I do sort of understand the choice -- 'his heart went out to her' is an idiomatic phrase that we all understand as to be moved with compassion if we were to say 'his bowels were moved'....that means something ENTIRELY different to 21st century English speakers. So, they stayed with the anatomic simile but used an organ that is more meaningful to us. 'Was moved with compassion' gets the point across but misses the involvement of the body implied in the original Greek.
In any case, Jesus told the young man to get up, and he did. Luke's gospel isn't always chronological; but this does appear to be before Jairus' daughter was raised. Luke records that the people praised God and news about Jesus 'spread throughout Judea and the surrounding country' (7:17)
Our next verse occurs in Jesus' explanation of the Parable of the Sower. Matthew and Mark both record this, but only Matthew has 'heart' specifically mentioned.
"Those along the path are the ones who hear, and then the devil comes and takes away the word from their hearts, so that they may not believe and be saved." -- Lk 8:12
What struck me this time, reading it is.. the enemy actually has access to the heart and can steal the word from the heart. That is a sobering thought. What can one do to avoid being so robbed?
Ponders a bit.
The I realized...the reason the birds can steal the seed, or that the enemy can steal the word...is that the soil (the heart) is too hard and it cannot penetrate and take root. If the seed/word roots...even just a little...the birds/ enemy cannot steal it away. Other things may happen to it...but it is not stolen. So anyone who has any receptivity to God's word should not be at risk for the enemy to steal away that word. It's on the the folks who have already pre-determined to not receive it who will lose it.
Hm....
One more for tonight and then I have to go fetch the laundry
The last verse for today is not actually spoken by Jesus...it is spoken by one of the Teachers who was questioning Jesus. He'd asked Jesus what was necessary to inherit eternal life...and Jesus replied, asking him how he read the Scriptures (the Old Testament)
He answered, " 'Love the LORD your God with all your heart and all your soul and with all your strength and wilt all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself." -- Lk 10:27
Jesus commends him for his answer, and then the guy wants to know exactly who the neighbor he is to love is...and Jesus replies with the story of the Good Samaritan.
This is an interesting passage; Matthew and Mark both record an exchange in which a Teacher asks Jesus for the greatest commandment, and Jesus gives that answer. I don't think that is a different take on the same exchange...both of those have the Teacher responding 'Well said!' to Jesus...and this guy wants to wiggle out of the requirement. I think it was a different guy at a different time. He may have heard Jesus give that answer and so gave it himself, hoping to score brownie points for his insight. Which, to be fair, he kinda did. Jesus did not commend a lot of people who were questioning him. But when he asked who his neighbor was...he showed his motives. Not ...'what should I do' but...'what is the least amount I can do? The minimum effort?' Which kind of implies...those love levels might not be at 100%.
All the heart.
All the soul (mind, will, emotions)
All the strength.
One's neighbor as one's self.
If we really, REALLY get that...things would change.
Just sayin'.









